Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Sep 17, 2019
  2. Aug 15, 2019
    • Rafael Weingärtner's avatar
      Standardize the configuration of "oslo_messaging" section · 22a6223b
      Rafael Weingärtner authored
      After all of the discussions we had on
      "https://review.opendev.org/#/c/670626/2", I studied all projects that
      have an "oslo_messaging" section. Afterwards, I applied the same method
      that is already used in "oslo_messaging" section in Nova, Cinder, and
      others. This guarantees that we have a consistent method to
      enable/disable notifications across projects based on components (e.g.
      Ceilometer) being enabled or disabled. Here follows the list of
      components, and the respective changes I did.
      
      * Aodh:
      The section is declared, but it is not used. Therefore, it will
      be removed in an upcomming PR.
      
      * Congress:
      The section is declared, but it is not used. Therefore, it will
      be removed in an upcomming PR.
      
      * Cinder:
      It was already properly configured.
      
      * Octavia:
      The section is declared, but it is not used. Therefore, it will
      be removed in an upcomming PR.
      
      * Heat:
      It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
      to be the same as we have in all other components
      
      * Ceilometer:
      Ceilometer publishes some messages in the rabbitMQ. However, the
      default driver is "messagingv2", and not ''(empty) as defined in Oslo;
      these configurations are defined in ceilometer/publisher/messaging.py.
      Therefore, we do not need to do anything for the
      "oslo_messaging_notifications" section in Ceilometer
      
      * Tacker:
      It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
      to be the same as we have in all other components
      
      * Neutron:
      It was already properly configured.
      
      * Nova
      It was already properly configured. However, we found another issue
      with its configuration. Kolla-ansible does not configure nova
      notifications as it should. If 'searchlight' is not installed (enabled)
      the 'notification_format' should be 'unversioned'. The default is
      'both'; so nova will send a notification to the queue
      versioned_notifications; but that queue has no consumer when
      'searchlight' is disabled. In our case, the queue got 511k messages.
      The huge amount of "stuck" messages made the Rabbitmq cluster
      unstable.
      
      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478274
      https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1665449
      
      * Nova_hyperv:
      I added the same configurations as in Nova project.
      
      * Vitrage
      It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
      to be the same as we have in all other components
      
      * Searchlight
      I created a mechanism similar to what we have in AODH, Cinder, Nova,
      and others.
      
      * Ironic
      I created a mechanism similar to what we have in AODH, Cinder, Nova,
      and others.
      
      * Glance
      It was already properly configured.
      
      * Trove
      It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
      to be the same as we have in all other components
      
      * Blazar
      It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
      to be the same as we have in all other components
      
      * Sahara
      It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
      to be the same as we have in all other components
      
      * Watcher
      I created a mechanism similar to what we have in AODH, Cinder, Nova,
      and others.
      
      * Barbican
      I created a mechanism similar to what we have in Cinder, Nova,
      and others. I also added a configuration to 'keystone_notifications'
      section. Barbican needs its own queue to capture events from Keystone.
      Otherwise, it has an impact on Ceilometer and other systems that are
      connected to the "notifications" default queue.
      
      * Keystone
      Keystone is the system that triggered this work with the discussions
      that followed on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/670626/2
      
      . After a long
      discussion, we agreed to apply the same approach that we have in Nova,
      Cinder and other systems in Keystone. That is what we did. Moreover, we
      introduce a new topic "barbican_notifications" when barbican is
      enabled. We also removed the "variable" enable_cadf_notifications, as
      it is obsolete, and the default in Keystone is CADF.
      
      * Mistral:
      It was hardcoded "noop" as the driver. However, that does not seem a
      good practice. Instead, I applied the same standard of using the driver
      and pushing to "notifications" queue if Ceilometer is enabled.
      
      * Cyborg:
      I created a mechanism similar to what we have in AODH, Cinder, Nova,
      and others.
      
      * Murano
      It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
      to be the same as we have in all other components
      
      * Senlin
      It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
      to be the same as we have in all other components
      
      * Manila
      It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
      to be the same as we have in all other components
      
      * Zun
      The section is declared, but it is not used. Therefore, it will
      be removed in an upcomming PR.
      
      * Designate
      It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
      to be the same as we have in all other components
      
      * Magnum
      It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
      to be the same as we have in all other components
      
      Closes-Bug: #1838985
      
      Change-Id: I88bdb004814f37c81c9a9c4e5e491fac69f6f202
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael Weingärtner <rafael@apache.org>
      22a6223b
  3. May 17, 2019
    • binhong.hua's avatar
      Make kolla-ansible support extra volumes · 12ff28a6
      binhong.hua authored
      When integrating 3rd party component into openstack with kolla-ansible,
      maybe have to mount some extra volumes to container.
      
      Change-Id: I69108209320edad4c4ffa37dabadff62d7340939
      Implements: blueprint support-extra-volumes
      12ff28a6
  4. Mar 08, 2019
    • Bai Yongjun's avatar
      Add cyborg to kolla-ansible · ed2fd243
      Bai Yongjun authored
      Because kolla-ansible not have cyborg so should add it.
      
      Implements: blueprint add-cyborg-to-kolla-ansible
      
      Depend-On: I497e67e3a754fccfd2ef5a82f13ccfaf890a6fcd
      
      Change-Id: I6f7ae86f855c5c64697607356d0ff3161f91b239
      ed2fd243
Loading